Working at height blog

Posted by Kate Langwick on 22-Sep-2014 14:00:00

Time to Tear up the Manual on Manual Handling?

 Last week we blogged about the shortcomings of warehouse steps and we briefly mentioned the manual handling involved in positioning them. This post looks at the manual handling involved in working at height more closely and tries to assess the financial benefit of reducing it! Read on for more...

Working at height and manual handling are generally seen as separate issues, but often working at height necessitates a significant amount of manual handling.  Just think about the last time you used a ladder, how did you transport it to the work area? How many trips did you make carrying the ladder, your tools, your work materials? How efficient a use of your time was it?

By thinking about an everyday task such as changing a light tube you see that using a ladder or warehouse step demands at least two trips to and from the work area to transport the access equipment (e.g. the ladder or steps), and then any tools and materials (cleaning equipment, new tube, etc.). If this process uses one person then that person has made four trips to and from the work area by the time the work is complete. Some companies will have risk assessed ladder or step usage and determined that a minimum of two people should be present if using these methods of accessing height, in this case you have at least 6 person trips for the job. Indeed, if using warehouse steps these can sometimes require two people just to physically move them into position (one supporting the top and one supporting the bottom).

So the time taken is more than it needs to be, and that has an impact on the cost of the job as well as the amount of downtime while the job is completed, even at modest labour rates the time taken adds up to significantly increased costs.

But there's another impact that might be less visible and that relates directly to the manual handling involved in the use of warehouse steps. Warehouse steps are big bulky tools, they weigh a significant amount, and generally need to be tilted onto two wheels for movement, this handling puts strain on the person moving the steps and requires them to travel the full distance bearing the weight of the unit. In 2011/12 7.6 million work days were lost to back pain and musculoskeletal issues*, the cost to industry is huge, the impact on individual companies is significant.

BY USING ALTERNATIVE EQUIPMENT THIS IMPACT CAN BE GREATY REDUCED:

  • Tools such as the Hugo lift can be easily pushed to the work area loaded with any tools or materials needed to complete the job: one trip there and one back, a much more efficient use of the worker's time
  • In production facilities, less time taken to complete a reactive or urgent maintenance task means less production down time and a more productive facility
  • Hugo lift will also significantly reduce the manual handling involved in a work at height task, especially when compared with warehouse (aircraft) steps thus reducing the potential nuisance and lost-days factors of musculoskeletal complaints

Hugo_in_amongst_plant

Hugo is just one of the solutions we supply to our customers to help them improve productivity and safety, if you are currently using steps or ladders and would like a second opinion on alternatives then please give our office team a call, we can arrange free site surveys and / or equipment demonstrations to suit you:

0113 287 8446

Finally, let us know if there are any issues you would like us to cover on the blog, we're always interested to hear about specific issues you might be facing and you can be sure if it's an issue for you it will be an issue for others as well.

 

*see http://www.nhs.uk/Livewell/workplacehealth/Pages/backpainatwork.aspx for source, viewed 8/9/2014

Topics: Compliance, News

Kate Langwick

Kate Langwick - Our commercial director, Kate likes everything to run smoothly, she ensures our systems & procedures are robust, and looks after all the back-up work that allows HLS to keep moving forward.

Comment on my blog