Introduction: The Final Piece of the Puzzle
This is the final instalment in our Working at Height Risk Assessment campaign, and it brings everything back to one critical question:
👉 Who is actually responsible for carrying out risk assessments?
Throughout this series, we have explored:
But even with the right processes in place, one issue continues to cause confusion:
Ownership.
Because in reality, risk assessments do not fail due to a lack of paperwork, they fail when responsibility is unclear, assumed, or not acted upon.
Why Responsibility Matters
Falls from height remain one of the leading causes of workplace fatalities and serious injuries.
And in many cases, it is not because a risk assessment did not exist, it is because:
👉 Clear responsibility is what turns a risk assessment from a document into action.
Understanding Working at Height Regulations
In the UK, the Work at Height Regulations 2005 place clear duties on employers and those in control of work at height activities.
Employers are also required to assess the risks before work begins and ensure the right control measures are in place.
At the same time, employees have legal duties to cooperate and follow safe working practices.
Industry Insight: What Do People Think?
As part of this campaign, we asked our LinkedIn audience:
“Who is mainly responsible for carrying out a risk assessment?”
The results showed:
What this tells us
Most people recognise that responsibility is shared.
However, nearly 1 in 4 respondents believe it sits with only one party, highlighting that confusion still exists.
👉 And where responsibility is unclear, risk increases.
Employer and Employee Responsibilities
Understanding the difference between employer and employee responsibilities is key to ensuring risk assessments are effective.
Employer Responsibilities:
Employers (and those in control of work at height) hold overall legal accountability.
They must:
👉 Even if a competent person completes the risk assessment, the employer remains responsible for ensuring it is suitable, sufficient, and followed.
Employee Responsibilities:
Employees also have legal duties when working at height.
They must:
Employees also contribute to risk assessments by providing real-world insight into tasks and identifying hazards that may not be immediately obvious.
Why This Matters in Practice
When responsibility is not clearly understood:
👉 This is where incidents happen.
Risk assessments are only effective when they are:
Conclusion: Bringing the Campaign Together
This final blog brings together everything we’ve explored throughout this campaign.
Across the series, we have covered:
And now, the final piece:
👉 Who is responsible?
The answer is clear:
The key takeaway:
👉 Risk assessments only work when responsibility is clear, and shared.
When employers provide the right planning, equipment, and systems, and employees actively engage and follow them, safer outcomes become part of everyday work.
If you are looking to improve how working at height is managed on your site:
👉 Download the HLS Working at Height Expert Guide 2026 for practical guidance, real-world insights, and actionable steps to reduce risk.
👉 Download the HLS Risk Assessment Template